Asia in Word War II Essay

World War II was the warf arefare that was supposed to end altogether wars. If maven was an eyewitness of the said issue more than than 50 years ago, it is hard non to agree. The scale of the war was unprecedented. Millions of men and women were involved either as fighting in the forepart lines, being part of the support crew and team or by working as instrumenty workers that supplied equipment and munitions. It was truly a global war because significant battles were fought not only in Europe but overly in Asia. What the Nazis were to Europe, the Nipponese Imperial military was to Asia.They were a dominant get out in countries such as China and Korea. They were able to terrorize and stamp down these two countries but it is not only in these territories that they flexed their military might. They as puff up went southeast. This paper go away look into the Nipponese concern of Southeast Asiatic countries a) Philippines b) Indonesia c) Thailand and d) Vietnam. The pap er pass on attempt to beat how the people from different regions and nations reacted towards Nipponese occupation.Whether the people accepted Japanese rule or rejected them the factors and forces that are working for and against the Japanese allow also be investigated. Occupying Force It does not require a rocket scientist or a gray-haired historiographer to realize that no people or nation will be delighted to find a foreign and assail the States on their front yard the next morning. It is just plain unacceptable to find roughone or something that disrupting someones routine. In the case of an occupying army the distraction and the aggravation is multiplied m each times over.At the onslaught it can generally be said that no one not even nice people fifty years earlier would interpret a red carpet welcome for the invading imperial forces. just now a basic concord of human nature can express the kickoff time researcher that in times of war the well-nigh basic human instinct that kicks in is self-preservation and that he will do everything to make his lot better even for his family. The following will wrangle the situation in four Asian countries located in the southeast. wholly have similarities and also differences.For example, the Philippines was already under U. S. rule although it was being groom for independence from the Americans. There was a significant military presence and for decades the Filipinos at least the elite and others who occupy important positions were collaborating with the Americans on various governmental issues. Vietnam was under French forces and based on the review of literature one can easily detect the dis kindred of the Vietnamese for their French rulers. This may explain their ambivalence over the Japanese occupation.Thailand on the other pop off did not have a long history of colonization that may also have affected their view of the incoming Japanese forces. Indonesia was at the beginning stages of for ming their national identity and the coming of the Japanese made for an provoke mix that generally favored the Indonesians. A more in-depth look will be found in the following pages. Elite vs. Peasants An accurate understanding on the effects of the Japanese Imperial Armys occupation of the southeast region of Asia will not be possible without first understanding the role of the different favorable classes.Asia fifty or more years ago had a hierarchical society where the gap between rich and poor is so distinct. There were landed nobles and on that point were peasants doing impale breaking labor. When the Japanese came, the invading army was like an equalizer of some sort. There are no rich and poor for the aggressor who is lot on subjugating a populace. For the Japanese soldier everyone is a Filipino, Indonesian, Vietnamese, and Thai.Everyone are considered as the enemy which with the slightest advantage will not hesitate to overthrow or rout the occupying forces. But there ar e numerous sources and documentary say that can prove connivance between the ruling elites of the land and the invading army. This is not hard to understand because a wise general will always recognize the clout and capability of the members of the higher social classes in terms of helping them control the situation or on the enemy end aid others in setting up a irregular movement to harass them.It then became a tricky political and social arrangement between the Japanese and the elite members of society who can be so practical in their outlook that they will be unforced to be complicit with the enemy because there is no point in continually opposing their presence. This is the case of all Southeast Asian nations mentioned earlier. Atrocities Another factor that needs to be discussed first before going into the detailed interpretation of topical anesthetic events is the mental and emotional baggage carried around by all the nations in the region even before the coming of the J apanese.This burden that they channel is the idea that the imperial armys ranks are filled with blood-thirsty and invoke crazed officers and men that will mutilate any nation that they will occupy. Before the bombing of the Pearl Harbor which is the clear and irrevocable token that the Japanese were in league with Hitler and Mussolini the Japanese already showed signs of Nazi like ambitions. While Hitler wanted to gain control of Europe, Japan displayed its liking for Asian domination and so in 1937 the said army invaded China.In Nanking the public saw what Japanese soldiers are capable of when let loose in enemy territory. The following is an eyewitness account of what happened in the days following their invasion of China and it will be known later as the infamous Nanking Massacre Foreigners who have traveled over the city plow many civilians bodies lying in the streets A considerable percentage of the unfounded civilians were the victims of shooting or bayoneting in the afternoon and evening of the 13th, which was the time of Japanese entry into the city.Any person who ran in fear or excitement, and any one who was caught in streets or alleys after dusk by planetary patrols was likely to be killed on the spot. Most f the severity was beyond even theoretical excuse. It proceeded in the Safety Zone as well as elsewhere, and many cases are plainly witnessed by foreigners and reputable Chinese. most bayonet wounds were barbarously cruel (Zhang, 2001, p. 4). This kind of report will easily spread throughout the Asian region and it would have easily filtered to the local population of every nation.This will explain the reason why there are those who steeled themselves for Japanese invasion and vowed never to be under Japanese rule. Zhang argues that if the Nanking Massacre did not happen, the Japanese Army would have expected a far better reception in other countries but the atrocities in China was well known and he wrote, At Nanking the Japanese Army has lost much of its reputation, and has thrown away a remarkable prospect to gain the respect of foreign opinion (p. 4, 2001).