Questions and Answers on Employee Motivation

Questions and Answers on Employee MotivationQuestion.01. How can expectancy possibleness be used to explain the differences in motivation between Alex and Katrien? What specifics from the case follow up to expectancy theory?Answer Expectancy theory1 states that the lastingness of a drift to act in a certain way depends on the strength of an expectation that the act will be followed by a assumption endpoint and on the attractiveness of that outcome to the individual. They be both college students so the expected dissolving agent would be that they would have similar opportunities and hand. Katrien is given many a(prenominal) elements in the trick characteristics model such as task identity and autonomy since she is able to create a product at the culinary center and see it to completion while Alex is placed in atomic number 53 area without any other tasks that could be considered motivational. Alex doesnt believe that performing at a certain train will attain a want out come like additional pay. The rewards are not consistent with his needs. For example, stocking to a greater extent produce may only result in a sticker which has no value or little value for Alex while Katrien has the hazard to take an additional $75.00 for attempting to sell 10 expensive bottles of truffle crude oil that is not only chall(a)enging but excessively adds value by serve uping her pay the bills.(high expectancy).Question.02. Alex states that he is underpaid for the litigate he does. What motivational theory does this apply to, and how would it explain Alexs behavior?Answer Alex is underpaid and thus equity theory3 could help explain his behavior. Also, the play characteristics theory could be applied since he is stuck in the produce department devoid of the other components of the model like science variety or task significance. Denise has a shorter term in the merchandise and gets paid more which adds to the inequitable postal service. The environment, the re petitive work and the unfair give-and-take are all disincentives for Alex so his behavior is consistently negative.Question.03. Using concepts from organizational justice, explain wherefore Alex knocks his bosss lunch to the floor. What should Alexs boss do to improve the frankness of his treatment?Answer Both distributive and procedural justice5 are components because of his pay and the fact that Jacque is treating Denise more favorably. Distributive justice is the perceived fairness of the outcome and this case he does not believe that he is being rewarded fairly. Alex has an unfreeze with procedural justice in that Jacque has a bias for Denise and therefore Alex believes that the accomplish is unfair. He knocks his lunch to the floor when he perceives a problem with interactional justice when Jacque interrupts his lunch with Katrien and he feels that he is not respected. Although he has 45 minutes for lunch, Jacque always wants him to return within 30 minutes, which is on ce once again unfair treatment as compared to other employees.Question.04. Using concepts from the emotions and moods chapter, explain why Alex retaliates toward his supervisor. Was his behavior driven purely by emotion, or did cognition also play a role? How so?Answer Alexs emotions are negative. He is exhibiting a negative effect, which is a mood state that is displaying his stress level, care and irritability toward his boss and the climate in which he is employed. His retaliation is an excited reaction to the poor treatment that he has endured from his boss and the favorable treatment toward Denise. Cognition plays a role since Alex is aware of his environment and has been trying to make sense of the injustices. His ultimate emotional response with Jacques sandwich was a result of an accumulation of perceived inequities.Question.05. Compare and contrast Alex and Katrien in terms of all(prenominal) persons level of work stress. How might stress affect their attitudes and beha viors within their work environment?Answer Katrien consistently has a smile on her smell and her level of farm out gratification is high. She has been given a variety of tasks and her job is fulfilling, therefore her level of work stress is low. In contrast, Alexs stress level is high with many perceived injustices and boring work. His attitude and behavior are poor and negative respectively since their managers have different styles of Theory X for Alex and Theory Y for Katrien. Alex will quit as soon as he finds another job while Katrien is content with her position and put challenges.Question.06. Discuss Alex and Katrien in terms of each persons job attitudes (for example, job satisfaction and organizational commitment). What factors might be responsible for any differences?Answer Again, the attitudes including job satisfaction and organizational commitment are positive for Katrien and negative for Alex. As mentioned, Alex is looking to leave the organization while Katrien is given more responsibilities and challenges. Her job satisfaction is high while his is low. Many factors mentioned earlier have contributed to this situation from the differences in managers and their respective styles to the biases and injustices including unfair treatment and inequitable pay that all contribute to a poor working environment and a overlook of motivation on Alexs part.Robbins/Judge, organizational Behavior,13th Edition, Pearson Education,2009, Pages 231237Robbins/Judge, Organizational Behavior,13th Edition, Pearson Education,2009, Pages 233-234Robbins/Judge, Organizational Behavior,13th Edition, Pearson Education,2009, Pages 234236Robbins/Judge, Organizational Behavior,13th Edition, Pearson Education,2009, Pages 229236Robbins/Judge, Organizational Behavior,13th Edition, Pearson Education,2009, Page 229Robbins/Judge, Organizational Behavior,13th Edition, Pearson Education,2009, Pages 285-293