Aristotle Impact on Law Essay

Aristotle (384 322 BC), was a Greek philosopher, logician, and scientist. Along with his teacher Plato, Aristotle is chiefly regarded as one of the most influential ancient thinkers in a various ways. Aristotle was born in Stagira in northern Greece, and as a juvenility man he studied in Platos honorary society in capital of Greece. After Platos death he left Athens to proceed in philosophical and biological research in Asia minuscule and Lesbos, and he was then invited by King Philip II of Macedonia to tutor his young son, Alexander the Great.Aristotle was extremely successful in tutoring Alexander, as he develoepd a great mind and was widely known for launching the invasion of the Persian Empire. Aristotle returned as a resident to Athens, and it was during this time (335-323 BC) when he wrote or at least completed any(prenominal) of his major theories, which included fairness. Aristotle and his teacher Plato, had same minds when it came to their political views. They both believed that law had a moral purpose. They thought that it make people live their lives ground on their reason, rather then their passion.When Aristotle talks about people following their reason, he means that they live their lives to the fullest winning in consideration all the talent and skill they argon deuced with and using it to their advantage. One accomplishes this by making the most out of what he/she has been given to benefit themselves in life. Basically, he was following the natural law tradition because he felt as though the most all important(predicate) purpose of law was to help people live their lives positively and be happy. Law helped lead people into a positive directionAristotle move on a theory of individual veraciouss, at the same time accept aspects of positive law theory and natural law theory. He was load-bearing(a) equity in judicial decision making and tells us how this passel operate consistently with the rule of law. Also, Aristotles brilliant i deas on ethical motive forms a basis for punishment in criminal law. He teaches how to acquire lawyers and the legal profession to incorporate ethics and virtue he teaches lawyers how they move be more persuasive. Furthermore, Aristotle also had a huge insight on moral virtues and believed that if these virtues are to be nurtured, law is needed.He believed that law is innate to help discipline citizens and their exploits, as well as to help keep back the beneficial habits they acquire. One of the most important aspects of our modern court/ trial run is the examining of the evidence. In most cases, the amount of quality evidence, or the lack of evidence, plays a huge role in making the final decision.Aristotle was the first soul to think out the problem on evidence. When he approached a problem, he would examine a) what people had previously written or said on the subject, b.) the general consensus of opinion on the subject, and c)a systematic study of everything else that is p art of or related to the subject. His studies on evidence extremely influenced the concept and everything that comes along with it in the present day.He believed that every action needs to be judged correspond to all the relevant circumstances to the situation. As just mentioned, Aristotle believed that every action needed to be judged. Therefore, he believed that judging these actions were to be done based on the concept of equity.It was the foundation of modern law and the road to justice. Aristotle was against some aspects of equity. For example, Aristotle believed that men were more useful and important in life. He believed that women should not be granted many of the rights that men had, such as the right to vote, but that is a different topic. When it came to judging someone based on his/her actions, Aristotle supported the concept of equity 100%. Aristotle seems to be primarily relate to discover and refine the moral standards by which human beings should be governed.What l aws are to be used to establish and maintain those standards depends on the good sense of the community and the prudence of its leaders, including its poets and other educators. In particular, his views on the connection mingled with the well-being of the political community and that of the citizens who make it up, his belief that citizens must actively participate in politics if they are to be happy and virtuous, and his analysis of what causes and prevents revolution within political communities have been a source of extravagance for many contemporary theorists.