Pro Gay Marriage

The controversy over cheery conjugation has travel highly publicized. However, this issue is not a overbold debate. Society has easygoing its opinions on the subject for many an(prenominal) a(prenominal) years. Everyone knows that people argon able to choose, concord to their body and instinct, their sexuality most of the prison term, tabulated statistics state that in nine show up of ten times option chosen is heterosexual. On the separate hand, the other ten percent belongs to the homosexual population, which has been harm every last(predicate) kinds of persecution and marginalization end-to-end recital, forcing them to live in hiding, with permanent fear, and in s goatdal.If at that place were no such(prenominal) people, we would be un picturesquely deprived of the works of a lot of painters, sculptors, writers, filmmakers, and many more. Works that we admire today and were created from their homosexual headland of view. A hardly a(prenominal) years ago in Europ e, just about governments, like the Netherlands, Belgium, and Spain, that are countries of horse opera thought and Christian tradition, pick up dared to legalize unification between resembling sex persons, giving them all the fulls and obligations of heterosexual couples, even including codion.Obama has not make a firm promise on either side of this issue, precisely he has recently indicated that he will do his part to vex for equal rights regarding the festive population. These clapperclaws are acts of justice that recognize the right of citizens to choose their sexual orientation by themselves without feeling discriminated or diminished, and they contact homosexual couples the alike right to form a family and offsp forebode that join concedes to heterosexual couples. Unfortunately these steps are not enough on that point are still a lot of people contrary to the marriage between people of same sex.The arguments against the right of gay couples to sweep up fire be beaten when they are examined closely. One of the most used has been that there is a deathblow to the family as an institution. Why? How? Cannot heterosexual couples continue to hook up with and dumbfound children if they indigence to. Does anyone, because of the establishment of this right, force mortal to marry or not marry incompatiblely from the traditional? Of course not. On the other hand, by allowing gay couples to marry and adopt children, this will inject new vitality to an institution, the family, that someone did not otice yet? suffered from a long time in a deep crisis in western society. Counting the way out of divorces, which grows each year, there are voices who predict a hopeless obsolescence. The problem is that probably just now through homosexuals, who as all persecuted minorities want to place out of the ghetto in which society has confined them, the family can reestablished the illusion and the evaluate that in a very large number of heterosexuals, p articularly teenaged people, seems to bring forth been lost.So there is no irony in me saying that I think that it is very possible that in twenty or thirty years statistics will discover more stable families among gay marriage. homogeneous prejudgment says that children adopted by gay couples will suffer ill-advised behavior because a child to be normal inescapably to find a father and a mother, not deuce fathers or two mothers. This dogmatic assertion does not develop any psychological support. Children of necessity love, either from two fathers, two mothers or two of them.There are in like manner some people who have a stubborn blindness and have not learned that a lot of cases of violence and sexual profane have been discovered in heterosexual couples. Those parents, either heterosexual or homosexual, are unique, and regarding the education of their children may be admirable, tyrannical, loving or cruel. It is open air that those people have fought so hard to be able to adopt children, fortunately now in some parts of Europe they can do, are raising children with enthusiasm and taking on the responsibility of their role.There is no reason behind all these arguments. There is an inveterate prejudice, an instinctive mutual exclusiveness toward those who practice love in a way that centuries of ignorance, stupidity, and obscurantism have demonized by calling it abnormal. It is important to be said that a recent statistic in the United States revealed that 33% of young people who commit suicide are gay, and half of them were rejected by their parents. Tell me what then is the reason for immature boys and girls who will be committing suicide right now because they are attracted to someone of the same sex?Maybe because society has failed to accept them, and one of the expose points for acceptance can be if their union in marriage is considered legal. Actually, science, biology, anthropology, psychology, and history have put ideas in place long ago and have established that talk of abnormality of sexual vocation in piece beings is risky and alienating unfortunately, the church has never been aligned with these assertions. The fact is that the gay population has been wondering through the years why they cannot marry as heterosexuals.The church has tried to explain for many years that marriage has to be between men and women under Gods eyes. This position is comprehendible especially from the Catholic standpoint. The other thing the church gives importance to along with marriage is procreation. So far, there is no need to do a fertility analysis on heterosexual couples who wish to marry. This is another point at which we realize that the church is not acting fairly.They expect us to believe that procreation is more important besides love in marriage, but really they do not care too much, because they do not punish the infertile heterosexuals. Homosexual population cannot accept that they are deprived of a fundamental right suc h as marriage. It should have to be a possibility that the church accepts to replace the rules and includes in their interpretation of marriage that can be either same or different sex. There is a lot of the homosexual population keeping their conviction and they would like to marry in a church.Others, instead, have chosen to beat away from the church because the ongoing ridicule they are actually suffering from the church. There has to be a point where we can put both parties together. The way to do it will be difficult, but not impossible. We have already seen that the church will never consider marriage between same sex people, but let me invite them to a detailed reflection. It would be that the purpose of marriage is the union of a man and a woman in front of Gods eyes, based on love that they profess.If they could think about people regardless their gender, gay marriage would fall into this category. That is what we have to make them recognize. We love each other regardl ess of sexual option. It is the same love. Love between two people who want to share their lives Everyone knows that in the beginning of the twenty first century no one follows some of the church proposeations. There are very a couple of(prenominal) believers who have endured celibacy until marriage this is one of the proofs with which we realize that the church needs a renovation to make them adapt to contemporary times.It would be fair to reflect and could accommodate a definition of marriage to speak of only the union between two people regardless of gender. The governments of as many countries as possible should urge their language academies to update the term and recommend the church does not put any barrier and even marry homosexual believers if they want to. Given that society has advanced so much, and some minorities are fortunately vanishing because rights are slowly recognizing.We have the opportunity to change the course of history and ensure that our generation be reme mbered for changes that really changed things for the develop live in the beginning of twenty first century. Therefore, it may be fair to say that the definition of marriage should be changed in baseball club to give homosexual couples the same rights and obligations as heterosexual couples. We are all individuals, and we have the same rights and nobody because of his or her sexual choice should be excluded.People cannot turn a deaf ear to all these cases of boys and girls who are committing suicide, and an comical step forward to normalize the situation would be by treating gay marriage as normal. Also a lesbian bride should have the same right looking forward to her wedding day, and have an engagement ring or even have and raise babies. It would be an important step towards a fundamental equalizing right of human beings, to be equal and to be able to live in a climate of respect, harmony, and fairness.