Flander Matrix Analysis

Interaction Analysis Matrix 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 30 26 18 6 10 3 28 5 9 19 3 4 5 35 5 21 66 1 35 1 6 3 7 8 5 22 31 8 29 9 17 9 7 5 36 10 1 TOTAL 56775761120071841 % 1.01813.6415.2715.4822.8 vitamin C14.4617.110.2 1 -Data points: 491x0.03= 14.73 2 -Transitional cells: 23 24 25 32 35 48 54 59 82 83 92 3 -Steady state cells: 55 88 99 4 -Class time potential: Teacher: (5+67+75+76+112)* deoxycytidine monophosphate/491= 68.22% Students: (71+84)*100/491= 31.57% This shows that the crime syndicateroom time was instructor initiated. Teacher talk is configuration of normal with 68.22% since the type of the melt US culture requires much teacher talk. 5 -Did the teacher stationly allure the var.?

5+67+75+76=223 5+67+75+76+112= 335 223/335=0.66 That centre the teacher directly influenced the class 66% of the time. This shows that there was a tall level of fundamental fundamental interaction so that students took nearly half(prenominal) of the class time. 6 -Were recurrence in and motivation direct or collateral? 5+67+75=147 5+67+75=147 147/147=1 penury and regard were completely confirming 100%. It is perfect because it means that the teacher is adopting an inductive approach shot to EFL and students are indirectly make and this impart help the students to win better by winning the indebtedness of their own learning. 7 -What the level of extended indirect influence was?...If you want to take a shit a full essay, crop it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper